wiki:Meetings/Meet-2011-03-15

KIELER Modularization Task Force Meeting

  • Date: March 15th, 2011
  • Attendants:
    • cds
    • chsch
    • cmot
    • haf
    • msp
  • Protocol: cds
  • Begin: 10:25
  • End: !11:50

Discussion

Problematic Use Cases

We have identified the following use cases as currently being problematic:

  1. New developers have to decide which plug-ins they need in their IDE.
  2. Auto builds break when building a plug-in that depends on recent changes in another plug-in.
  3. Users don't know which features they should install.
  4. Potential developers cannot distinguish between production code, experimental code and legacy code.

Possible Solutions

We have talked about the following approaches:

  • Eliminate dependencies between features (problems 2 and 3)
    • Define new features that contain all plug-ins they need. That way, features could be installed without having to worry about any other features they depend on.
    • Less features would be needed. Installation would get easier, because the features could be geared towards our research areas without having to know about individual projects.
    • A problem is that every feature would have to be built separately during the nightly build process -> time consuming
      • Could perhaps be remedied by introducing Maven to manage dependencies.
  • Project sets (problem 1 and 4)
    • Hard to manage if there are many project sets.
    • Easy to use for developers.
    • Perhaps only have very few project sets, comparable to the features.
    • Could be automatically generated somehow.
  • Dependency graph (problem 1)
    • Introduce an automatically generated graph showing the dependencies between our plugins.
    • Harder to use for developers.

Final Solution

We propose the following solution:

  • Have few features. The features must be self-contained and geared towards research areas. They must be configured manually.
  • Automatically transform the feature definitions to project sets for developers.

The Plan

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, ...

  • Prepare the features. We propose the following features: (included are the names of those responsible for creating that feature, as well as a list of plug-ins that could be part of it)
    • SyncCharts (haf+cmot)
      Relevant Core parts, SyncCharts, Esterel, S, Ptolemy, KIEM, KSBASE, KIML, GraphViz, KARMA, KEX (with SyncCharts examples)
    • KAOM (msp)
      Relevant Core parts, KAOM, KIML, Ptolemy import, KARMA, KLoDD, Klay, KEX (with KAOM examples), KVID, KIEM, Validation Manager
    • UML (jes+cmot)
      Papyrus bridge, Maude, KIEM, KIML, OGDF (class diagrams), GraphViz, Validation Manager, KEX (with UML examples)
    • KEG (msp)
      Editor, GrAna, KIML, KSBASE, all layout algorithms, Import / Export incl. XML formats, KEX (with layout examples), Layout View
    • Layout Graphiti (msp)
      KIML, all layout algorithms, Graphiti integration
    • Layout GMF (msp)
      KIML, all layout algorithms, GMF integration
  • Update Hudson
    • Include new features. (done by those responsible for the respective features)
      • Job name begins with Feature2.
      • Folder features/de.cau.cs.kieler....feature2.
    • Write the transformation that turns feature definitions to project sets. (haf)
    • Update the documentation (Wiki) to link to the generated project sets. (?)
  • Deadline: Next KIELER release, mid April