...

• Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation. 
  See the wiki Comparison of the graphical representation.
• Experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and final state option).

Presented at:

• • Synchrounous Synchronous Meeting 10.10.2012
  • Synchrounous Synchronous Meeting 15.10.2012
  • Tea Meeting

First Itemis Meeting

Date: 24.10.2012

See Meeting Protocol

• cmot: KIELER  KIELER SyncCharts
• wah: A comaparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation) and experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT SCT (adapting the transition types and adding types and adding the initial and final state option).

• cmot/itemis: Wiki list of differences
  
  
• itemis: 
  
  • how are valued signals defined? (next meeting)
  • time table will be evaluated (next meeting)

A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)

Start: October/November 2012

...

• Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation. 

...

• 
  See the wiki Comparison of the textual desciption language.

Presented at:

• • Synchronous Meeting 30.10.2012

Second Itemis Meeting

Date: 02.11.2012

See Meeting Protocol

• cmot: revision of the last meeting + Expression Examples
• wah: A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)

• Itemis: 
  • provided a pdf guide about the creation of a derived editor
  • adaption of the SGraph: 6 Weeks (4 weeks at best)
  • adaption of the expressions: a short period, because a framework is present