Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Agenda

Get familiar with Yakindu SCT

Start: September 2012

wah: Reverse Engineering

A comparison between KIELER SyncCharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation)

Start: October 2012

Presented at:

First Itemis Meeting

Date: 24.10.2012

Participants:

    • cmot
    • wah
    • ssm
    • anm (Itemis)
    • axt (Itemis)

See Meeting Protocol

  • cmot: KIELER SyncCharts
  • wah: A comaparison between KIELER SyncCharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation) and experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and the final state option)
  • cmot/itemis: Wiki list of differences

  • itemis
    • How are valued signals defined? (next meeting)
    • Two possible ways to adapt the YAKINDU SCT Editor: 
      • currently favored: dependency injection
      • alternatively: derived editor (old variant)
    • Time table will be evaluated (next meeting)

A comparison between KIELER SyncCharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)

Start: October/November 2012

Presented at:

Second Itemis Meeting

Date: 02.11.2012

Participants:

    • cmot
    • wah
    • bdu
    • ssm
    • ima
    • anm (Itemis)
    • axt (Itemis)

See Meeting Protocol

  • Itemis
    • Provided a pdf guide about the creation of a derived editor
    • Adaption of the SGraph: 6 Weeks (4 weeks at best)
    • Adaption of the expressions: a short period, because a framework is present
  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. Unknown User (pkl)