Details:
Every thursday at is a Synchronous Meeting.
Get familiar with Yakindu SCT
Start: September 2012
wah: Reverse Engineering
A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation)
Start: October 2012
- Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation.
See the wiki Comparison of the graphical representation. - Experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and final state option).
Presented at:
First Itemis Meeting
Date: 24.10.2012
See Meeting Protocol
- cmot: KIELER SyncCharts
- wah: A comaparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation) and experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and final state option)
- cmot/itemis: Wiki list of differences
- itemis:
- How are valued signals defined? (next meeting)
- Two possible ways to adapt the YAKINDU SCT Editor:
- currently favored: dependency injection
- alternatively: derived editor (old variant)
- Time table will be evaluated (next meeting)
A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)
Start: October/November 2012
- Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation.
See the wiki Comparison of the textual desciption language.
Presented at:
Second Itemis Meeting
Date: 02.11.2012
See Meeting Protocol
- cmot: Revision of the last meeting + Expression Examples
- wah: A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)
- Itemis:
- Provided a pdf guide about the creation of a derived editor
- Adaption of the SGraph: 6 Weeks (4 weeks at best)
- Adaption of the expressions: a short period, because a framework is present
Overview
Content Tools