Get familiar with Yakindu SCT

Start: September 2012

Reverse Engineering

A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation)

Start: October 2012

• Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation. 
  See the wiki Comparison of the graphical representation.
• Experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and final state option).

Presented at:

• • Synchronous Meeting 10.10.2012
  • Synchronous Meeting 15.10.2012
  • Tea Meeting

First Itemis Meeting

Date: 24.10.2012

See Meeting Protocol

• cmot: KIELER SyncCharts
• wah: A comaparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (graphical representation) and experimental source code changes on the YAKINDU SCT (adapting the transition types and adding the initial and final state option)
• cmot/itemis: Wiki list of differences
  
  
• itemis: 
  
  • How are valued signals defined? (next meeting)
  • Two possible ways to adapt the YAKINDU SCT Editor: 
    
    • currently favored: dependency injection
    • alternatively: derived editor (old variant)
  • Time table will be evaluated (next meeting)

A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)

Start: October/November 2012

• Generating a comparison table to show the difference between the KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT graphical representation. 
  See the wiki Comparison of the textual desciption language.

Presented at:

• • Synchronous Meeting 30.10.2012

Second Itemis Meeting

Date: 02.11.2012

See Meeting Protocol

• cmot: Revision of the last meeting + Expression Examples
• wah: A comparison between KIELER Synccharts and YAKINDU SCT (textual description language)

• Itemis: 
  • Provided a pdf guide about the creation of a derived editor
  • Adaption of the SGraph: 6 Weeks (4 weeks at best)
  • Adaption of the expressions: a short period, because a framework is present